12 angry men movie Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

12 angry manpower movie - Essay ExampleThe movie for nominated for three Oscars(Best Director, Best Picture and Best Writing, screenplay based on material from an different medium) and finds a place in the list of all time great movies. In 2007, the library of Congress chose 12 angry men for preservation in the United States National Film Registry. Here, we analyze the dynamics of the 12 jurors and what might have influenced them in taking a decision in favor of or against the accused.The movie begins with the scene in which the judge is seen giving instructions to a jury consisting of 12 gentlemen. The judge informs the jury that the defendant entrust have to take the electric chair if proved guilty. The jury is also instructed that their judgment should be unanimous. The jury then moves into the jury room where they get introduce with the other members of the jury and start their work. The case which opens up as an open and shut case takes a turn when one of jurors (juror 8) deci des to veto the decision of the other eleven jurors. He is able to convince the other jurors that the defendant should be acquitted as there is doubt beyond logical limit quizzical the authenticity of the witnesses. However, the other jurors do not sustain the juror 8 quickly. The juror 8 faces strong argument from the other members which sets up the film. The jury mulish to vote 12-0 in favor of acquittal and closing scene shows the twelve jurors leaving the jury room to present their findings of fact to the court.Juror 8(Henry Fonda) is the most primal character of the plot as he is the first to veto the decision and question the authenticity of the witnesses. Though the juror 8 appears both confident and ill at ease(p) at the beginning, as the discussion proceeds he succeeds in making the other jurors believe in his argument that there is doubt beyond reasonable limit in declaring the boy as guilty of murder. Juror 9 immediately supports the view of juror 8. Juror 5 and 2 a lso follow